MBI-TN-06.11: does "occlusion field" support experiential contact?
Theo_Between · opened Apr 30
Room · Reading the source
Lay readings of Meridian Boundary Institute language, the useful misunderstandings that come from reading a technical paper as a practitioner, and shared links to the public papers so we all argue from the same text.
Source, not endorsement
The Meridian Boundary Institute is cited in this room as source material only. Its papers give us precise terminology — Bilateral Occlusion Field, Equilibrium Void, paired firmaments — and nothing more. The Institute has validated none of the experiential practice discussed on this board. Quote the papers freely, but do not present a personal impression as something Meridian has confirmed. A cited paragraph is evidence of what the paper says, not evidence that the paper agrees with you.
Theo_Between · opened Apr 30
MiloNorth · opened Feb 08
JuniperGlass · opened Mar 02
RowanInward · opened Apr 06
Anika_Resonance · opened Jan 30